| you in section: the Biofield as the perception channel
This experimental situation forced examinees to listen to own sensations, but she created additional methodical difficulty: examinees could start to draw aside every minute a hand in reply to seeming sensation. Therefore the additional condition has been entered: in that case, when the examinee will remove a hand wrongly (i.e. in an interval between influences), it immediately as soon as his hand again will appear on a key, will receive weak warning influence, and behind it blow by a current. This additional condition should serve as the return information and help examinees to find right answers. In all other relations experimental conditions were identical. Горячие Цены на горящие, египет туры.
Results of this new series of experiments have appeared opposite to results of the first series. In the end of a series examinees removed in reply to action of visible beams a hand from a key, or at all without giving thus erroneous reactions, or doing individual errors.
For example, ispytuemaja F correctly removed a hand from a key after 139 combinations (after 12 experiments). On 34th experiment this ispytuemaja at a total absence of erroneous reactions showed from 18 influences of 7 correct removals and 11 passed signals (with the subsequent current rush). This result is not absolute, but seven correct reactions to visible light at casual enough time of giving of signals can testify that light signals caused at ispytuemoj expressed enough sensations.
As examples it is possible to cite the data of two more examinees. Ispytuemaja S has been spent earlier through the first series of experiments. As 300 combinations of the first series have not given any results it has taken part in the second series.
|
